Colonel Douglas Macgregor's message to Sweden
Bottom left: Colonel Douglas Macgregor, CEO of media outlet "Our country, our choice." Top right: Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson impersonating a soldier.
After Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson's speech to the nation on Sweden's public broadcasting channel 1 on May 13, 2024, US Colonel Douglas Macgregor has a message for the Nordic countries: American nuclear weapons can be brought in without the Swedish government being informed or able to stop it. According to the agreement, the U.S. not only has the right to use nuclear weapons on Swedish territory for defense but also as a platform for American offensive attacks against any country in the world, not just Russia. The DCA agreement is of the same kind that Germany and Japan were forced to sign after losing World War II.
Macgregor is a decorated war hero and military affairs expert commentator. In 1991, during the Battle of 73 Easting in the Gulf War, he distinguished himself as a world-class cavalry officer, when the unit he led destroyed 70 enemy tanks in 23 minutes without losing a single one of their own.
Douglas Macgregor:
This is not just a purely regional agreement that prefaces or at least is predicated on the notion that you are attacked and then we come and help.
The idea is that you now have a state of readiness in the United States Armed Forces that will be placed in your country that is ready to pull the trigger and go to war essentially without much consultation. If any against uh Russia, I would think this is a very dangerous document.
The model for these agreements were really the treaties that we reached with Germany and Japan who had lost a major war, had little ground to stand on and essentially signed pretty much whatever we put in front of them.
You are now essentially hostage as a nation to whatever the United States does or does not do against almost any enemy anywhere, not just uh Russia, but potentially any adversary.
If you read [the DCA agreement] carefully, [it says] we have unobstructed access to all 17 bases.
There's nothing in there that prevents us from bringing in nuclear weapons or any other advanced weapon system that we may develop.
In the meantime, this means that Sweden can be used as a launching pad for attack against Russia or again against anyone that the United States ends up in conflict with.
If I were Swedish, I would not support it.
What could unleash a war?
There are all sorts of scenarios that could lead to conflict, you know, incidents inside the Arctic Circle, competition, conflict over access to resources.
And then events that happened perhaps in the Black Sea, the Mediterranean or even in the Pacific that lead to a confrontation between the United States and Russia or China or someone else.
And suddenly your bases are being used as a point of delivery for weapon, weapons of some kind missiles, tactical ballistic missiles, data, ballistic missiles and so forth.
How big is the military threat from the Russian Federation?
I don't see an existential threat from Russia to Sweden. I think this is a huge lie.
They [the Russians] simply want Ukraine to be neutral. They don't want a state on their border that is armed to the teeth with weapons pointed at them.
We [the United States of America] are interested in provoking Russia, literally from Finland all the way to Armenia.
This is catastrophically stupid and unnecessary.
And that's something that the Swedes need to think about. I certainly would hope that your parliament would debate this matter very thoroughly before they effectively sign on for it.
What could the government of Sweden do to stop the import of US nuclear weapons into the country if they learned that it was happening?
The notion that you would have veto power over anything that we might do on your national soil is ludicrous and that, that's just not going to work as soon as you agree to allow a foreign army to march across your territory, you have already surrendered some portion of your sovereignty.
How destructive would a nuclear war be?
We've looked at what could happen in a nuclear exchange between, say Russia and the United States.
And we've concluded that in the first hour, 90 million Americans would die.
You've got to sit down and understand the world is much smaller now and decisions are made in seconds, weapons are launched and reach their targets in minutes.
So if you don't have control of what's on your soil, you're at very great risk because you've essentially abdicated responsibility for your own national security to a foreign power.
The maps below show how the government of Sweden, as a result of their decision to take the country into NATO and a DCA treaty with the US, will upset the military balance (with respect to nuclear weapons) between 2022 and 2024.
What is NATO's agenda of permanent expansion about?
This is a last ditch effort by this ruling class to do two things. First of all, maintain conditions of conflict and hostility towards Russia, which they deem as indispensable to their continued political dominance.
And then secondly, they are subjugating you to their will.
All of these people in Stockholm, Brussels, London, Washington, Paris, Berlin.
They are all united in a purpose to reshape Europe according to their views, their values, their principles.
And I think most Europeans have figured out that they don't necessarily subscribe to these values.
You know, Swedes actually like Sweden, they want it to stay Swedish.
The same thing is true in Norway, England, Scotland Wales. But the governments don't care about that, you know, refashioning you into an amorphous mass of sedated consumers with no real national identity or purpose seems to be the, the end state
The map below shows how aggressively NATO has expanded in Europe since 1998.
Whose agenda is it?
You are ruled by a class of people very similar to the people that rule us in Washington.
We've lost control of our lives to this ruling class.
Now, who are these people, what we call them? Globalists? Neoconservatives.
You can come up with any number of different terms, but they are people who think that they have a monopoly on wisdom, truth and understanding and that we are incapable of making decisions in our own interest.
Hence, they seek to brush aside any democratic forum that might expose their agenda to public scrutiny.
In other words, they try to use executive orders and edicts in order to effectively remove from our populations, our electorates, the option of deciding something for themselves.
This is a very antidemocratic authoritarian class and as long as it rules in Europe and in the United States, we are going to remain at war with any number of different nations.
So the ruling class, to be blunt, with you needs to be removed.
Now, it would be nice to do that at the ballot box.
I don't know if that's gonna work.
I sincerely hope so.
Colonel Douglas Macgregor on the future of NATO:
Sacred cows are never slain, they simply vanish.
I think NATO is a sacred cow that over the next few years will simply vanish.
Macgregor concludes with the advice to Swedes to find out what unknown classified parts of the DCA agreement their government has not disclosed. These classified parts could specifically pertain to nuclear weapons and when and how they are planned to be used:
As a swede, I would want to look into that. I would want to know what is not public and find out what's in it.
Sources: